Socio-Scientific Issues in Teacher Education

A methodological approach to communicating the ambivalence, multi-perspectivity and complementarity of sustainable development claims


Abstract views: 29 / PDF downloads: 8

Authors

  • Andrea Frantz-Pittner University of Klagenfurt, Austria
  • Christina Pichler-Koban E.C.O. Institut für Ökologie, Klagenfurt, Austria https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7863-0702
  • Merima Ramic NaturErlebnisPark Science Education Centre, Graz, Austria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51724/arise.80

Keywords:

socio-scientific issues, SSI, education for sustainable development, ESD, teacher education

Abstract

Decisions in terms of sustainable development cannot be made solely on the basis of scientific facts, but must also include ethical, cultural, ecological, socio-political and economic aspects in order to achieve a balance between – often contradictory – demands. Socio-scientific issues (SSI), i.e. problems at the interface between scientific concepts and social conditions, are at the centre of an innovative teaching approach that is used in the basic and advanced training of educators. The fact-based decision-making supported by scaffolding techniques in a real-world context provides an insight into the multidimensionality of sustainability and supports the development of sustainability-related teaching skills in (future) teachers. The article uses specific teaching examples to provide an insight into the teaching concept and discusses the potential for use in the qualification of teachers and in other fields of adult education based on the findings from pilot projects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Andrea Frantz-Pittner, University of Klagenfurt, Austria

Andrea Frantz-Pittner, Prof. Dr. 

Teaches Primary Science and Humanities and STEM Teaching at the Institute in Early Childhood and Primary Teacher Education at the University College of Teacher Education Styria. She is a research associate at the Institute of Instructional and School Development at the University of Klagenfurt. Her work and research interests focus on socially integrative and diversity-sensitive science and sustainability education and cooperation between formal and non-formal educational institutions, with a particular focus on critical thinking education, educational action research and science capital teaching. Prof.

Christina Pichler-Koban, E.C.O. Institut für Ökologie, Klagenfurt, Austria

Christina Pichler-Koban, DI Dr.

Works as a landscape planner and project manager at E.C.O. Institute for Ecology in Klagenfurt and as a research assistant at the Institute for Teaching and School Development at the University of Klagenfurt. She manages and works on interdisciplinary research and education projects at the interface between nature and society and develops methods for communicating nature conservation topics in extracurricular education. She is also active in committees such as the Austrian Biodiversity Council, the ÖKOLOG Scientific Advisory Board and the Vienna Woods Biosphere Reserve.

Merima Ramic, NaturErlebnisPark Science Education Centre, Graz, Austria

Merima Ramic, BSc. BEd.
Building on her teacher training and specialist studies in chemistry and English. She  is Head of Science Education and Educational Research at the NaturErlebnisPark Science Education Centre in Graz as well as freelance in various contexts of low-threshold adult education. Her professional focus is on combining science and language, teaching the nature of science and taking into account the individual needs of learners in heterogeneous groups.

References

Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management, Austrian Federal Ministry for Education, Arts and Culture & Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research (2008). Austrian Strategy for Education for Sustainable Development. https://www.bmbwf.gv.at/dam/jcr:701bea45-5218-4c42-b123-fd251228b4b2/bine_strategie_e_18300.pdf

Belova, N., Eilks, I., & Feierabend, T. (2015). The evaluation of role-playing in the context of teaching climate change. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9477-x

European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture, (2019). Key competences for lifelong learning, Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/569540

Evagorou, M., Nielsen, J. A., & Dillon, J. (2020). Science Teacher Education for Responsible Citizenship: Towards a Pedagogy of Relevance Through Socioscientific Issues. Springer.

Hadjichambis, A. C., Reis, P., Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D., Činčera, J., Boeve-de Pauw, J., Gericke, N., Knippels, M. C. (Eds.) (2020). Conceptualizing Environmental Citizenship for 21st Century. Springer.

Heinrich, M., Rauch, F., Mayr, P. (2005): Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung Im Österreichischen Schulsystem – eine explorative Vorstudie zu Zukunftsbildern von Schülerinnen und Schülern. Abschließender Projektbericht zur Studie im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur. Wien: bm: bwk.

Jarman, R., & McClune, B. (2007). Developing scientific literacy: using news media in the classroom: Using news media in the classroom. McGraw-Hill Education.

Kläy, A., Zimmermann, A. B., & Schneider, F. (2015). Rethinking science for sustainable development: Reflexive interaction for a paradigm transformation. Futures, 65, 72–85.

Maass, K. (2011). How can teachers’ beliefs affect their professional development? ZDM Mathematics Education 43, 573–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0319-4

Maass, K., Engeln, K. (2018):.Impact of professional development involving modelling on teachers and their teaching. ZDM Mathematics Education 50(1), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0911-y

Maass, K., Engeln, K. (2019). Professional development on connections to the world of work in mathematics and science education. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51(6), 967–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01047-7

Maass, K., Sorge, S., Romero-Ariza, M., Hesse, A., Straser, O. (2022). Promoting Active Citizenship in Mathematics and Science Teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 20(4), 727–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10182-1

Ratcliffe, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship: Teaching socio-scientific issues. Open university.

Rauch, F., & Steiner, R. (2013). Competences for education for sustainable development in teacher Education. CEPS Journal, 3(1), 9–24.

Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17, 89–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Zeidler, D. L., Kahn, S. (2014). It’s debatable!: Using socioscientific issues to develop scientific literacy K–12. NSTA Press.

Downloads

Published

12/22/2025

How to Cite

Frantz-Pittner, A., Pichler-Koban, C., & Ramic, M. (2025). Socio-Scientific Issues in Teacher Education: A methodological approach to communicating the ambivalence, multi-perspectivity and complementarity of sustainable development claims. Action Research and Innovation in Science Education, 7(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.51724/arise.80