First-Year Pre-service Primary School Teachers’ Conceptual Structure of Ecosystem Ecology Concepts
Abstract views: 598
/ 
PDF downloads: 18
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51724/arise.41Keywords:
ecology, misconceptions, food chain, concepts, pre-service primary school teachersAbstract
Science education research has been increasingly concerned with students’ and teachers’ conceptions of central scientific concepts over the past decades. However, science teaching today should not only convey knowledge but also values and science practices in order to empower students to become responsible citizens in a world that is facing ecological as well as social problems. Thus, a profound understanding of ecology and systems thinking skills are seen as paramount. This paper explores first-year pre-service primary school teachers’ conceptual understanding of ecology through the use of a word association test. Students were given four stimulus words and asked to provide five response words to each stimulus. Furthermore, they were asked to formulate a sentence related to biology, using each stimulus word. Response words were categorised and the frequency of the words was calculated. The findings show very limited understanding of the ecological concepts and their interrelatedness. Furthermore, the students showed numerous misconceptions regarding energy flow and food chain relationships. Thus our findings support other authors’ propositions that students often struggle with understanding ecology concepts. The findings further imply that the instruction students receive at school is not successful in replacing existing misconceptions with accurate science concepts.
References
Adeniyi, E. O. (1985). Misconceptions of selected ecological concepts held by some Nigerian students. Journal of Biological Education, 19(4), 311-316.
Allen, M. (2017). Early understandings of simple food chains: A learning progression for the preschool years. International Journal of Science Education, 39(11), 1485-1510.
Bahar, M., Johnstone, A. H., & Sutcliffe, R. G. (1999). Investigation of students' cognitive structure in elementary genetics through word association tests. Journal of Biological Education, 33(3), 134-141.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Burgstaller, J. & Schullerer, P. (2008). B & U 1. Linz: Veritas.
Burgstaller, J. & Schullerer, P. (2009). B & U 2. Linz: Veritas.
Burgstaller, J. & Schullerer, P. (2010). B & U 3. Linz: Veritas.
Campbell, T., Schwarz, C., & Windschitl, M. (2016). What we call misconceptions may be necessary stepping-stones toward making sense of the world. Science and Children, 53(7), 28-33.
Chan, K. H. K. (2019). Using a post-box strategy to elicit & address student misconceptions in biology. The American Biology Teacher, 81(9), 668-672.
Chapin III, F. S., Matson, P. A., & Vitousek, P. (2011). Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. Springer Science & Business Media.
Dauer, J. M., Doherty, J. H., Freed, A. L. & Anderson, C. D. (2014). Connections between student explanations and arguments from evidence about plant growth. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13, 397–409.
Gonzales del Solar, R., & Marone, L. (2001). The "freezing" of science: Consequences of the dogmatic teaching of ecology. BioScience, 51(8), 683 – 687.
Demetriou, D., Korfiatis, K., & Constantinou, C. (2009). A ‘bottom-up’approach to food web construction. Journal of Biological Education, 43(4), 181-187.
Duit, R. (1999) Conceptual change approaches in science education. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 263–282). Amsterdam, Pergamon.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671-688.
Eilam, B. (2012). System thinking and feeding relations: learning with a live ecosystem model. Instructional Science, 40(2), 213-239.
Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children's science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education, 66(4), 623-633.
Gloning, Ch. & Hofer, H. (2013). Neugierig auf Biologie 2. Wien: E. Dorner.
Gloning, Ch. & Hofer, H. (2014a). Neugierig auf Biologie 3. Wien: E. Dorner.
Gloning, Ch. & Hofer, H. (2014b). Neugierig auf Biologie 4. Wien: E. Dorner.
Gonzales del Solar, R., & Marone, L. (2001). The "freezing" of science: Consequences of the dogmatic teaching of ecology. BioScience, 51(8), 683 – 687.
Grotzer, T. A., & Bell Baska, B. (2003). How does grasping the underlying casual structures of ecosystems impact students' understanding? Journal of Biological Education 38(1), 16 – 29.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Surabhi, M., & Lei, L. (2007). Fish swim, rocks sit, and lungs breath: Expert-novice understanding of complex systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences 16(3), 307 – 331.
Hogan, K. (2000). Assessing students' systems reasoning in ecology. Journal of Biological Education, 35(1), 22-28.
Hokayem, H., & Gotwals, A. W. (2016). Early elementary students’ understanding of complex ecosystems: A learning progression approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(10), 1524-1545.
Hovardas, T., & Korfiatis, K. (2011). Towards a critical re-appraisal of ecology education: Scheduling an educational intervention to revisit the ‘balance of nature’metaphor. Science & Education, 20(10), 1039-1053.
Hovardas, T., & Korfiatis, K. J. (2006). Word associations as a tool for assessing conceptual change in science education. Learning and instruction, 16(5), 416-432.
Inagaki, K., & Hatano G. (2002). Young children’s naive thinking about the biological world. New York: Psychology Press.
Jilka, S. & Kadlec, V. (2009a). BioTOP 1. Wien: ÖBV.
Jilka, S. & Kadlec, V. (2009b). BioTOP 2. Wien: ÖBV.
Jilka, S. & Kadlec, V. (2010). BioTOP 3. Wien: ÖBV.
Jordan, R., & Duncan, R. G. (2009). Student teachers' images of science in ecology and genetics. Journal of Biological Education, 43(2), 62-69.
Jordan, R. C., Sorensen, A. E., & Hmelo-Silver, C. (2014). A conceptual representation to support ecological systems learning. Natural Sciences Education, 43(1), 141-146.
Keil, F. C. (2012). Running on empty? How folk science gets by with less. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(5), 329-334.
Keil, M. & Ruttner, B. (2001). BIOS 1. Wien: E.Dorner.
Keil, M. & Ruttner, B. (2003). BIOS 3. Wien: E.Dorner.
Keil, M. & Ruttner, B. (2004). BIOS 4. Wien: E.Dorner.
Korfiatis, K. J., Hovardas, T., Tsaliki, E., & Palmer, J. A. (2009). Rural children's views on human activities and changes in a Greek Wetland. Society and Natural Resources, 22(4), 339-352.
Leach, J., Driver, R., Scott, P., & Wood-Robinson (1996). Children's ideas about ecology 3: Ideas found in children aged 5‐16 about the interdependency of organisms. International Journal of Science Education, 18(2), 129-141.
Möslinger, E. & Schirl, K. (2011). Expedition Biologie 1. Wien: E. Dorner.
Möslinger, E. & Schirl, K. (2012). Expedition Biologie 2. Wien: E. Dorner.
Özkan, Ö., Tekkaya, C., & Geban, Ö. (2004). Facilitating conceptual change in students' understanding of ecological concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(1), 95-105.
Palmer, J. A., & Suggate, J. (2004). The development of children’s understanding of distant places and environmental issues: Report of a UK longitudinal study of the development of ideas between the ages of 4 and 10 years. Research Papers in Education, 19(2), 205-237.
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. New York: Viking.
Rogl, H. & Bergmann, L. (2003). Biologie aktiv 1. Graz: Leykam.
Rogl, H. & Bergmann, L. (2004). Biologie aktiv 2. Graz: Leykam.
Rogl, H. & Bergmann, L. (2005). Biologie aktiv 3. Graz: Leykam.
Rogl, H. & Bergmann, L. (2006). Biologie aktiv 4. Graz: Leykam.
Sato, M., & James, P. (1999). " Nature" and" environment" as perceived by university students and their supervisors. Environmental Education and Information, 18, 165-172.
Schermaier, A. & Weisl, H. (2008). bio@school 1. Linz: Veritas.
Schermaier, A. & Weisl, H. (2010). bio@school 3. Linz: Veritas.
Schermaier, A., Weisl, H. & Miksche, D. (2011). bio@school 4. Linz: Veritas.
Slingsby, D., & Barker, S. (2005). The role of learned societies, government agencies, NGOs, advocacy groups, media, schools, and environmental educators in shaping public understanding of ecology. In: E. A. Johnson & M. J. Mappin (Eds.), Environmental education and advocacy: Changing perspectives of ecology and education (pp. 72–87). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Torkar, G., & Bajd, B. (2006). Trainee teachers' ideas about endangered birds. Journal of Biological Education, 41(1), 5-8.
Torkar, G., & Krašovec, U. (2019). Students’ attitudes toward forest ecosystem services, knowledge about ecology, and direct experience with forests. Ecosystem Services, 37, 100916.
Uzuntiryaki, E., & Geban, Ö. (2005). Effect of conceptual change approach accompanied with concept mapping on understanding of solution concepts. Instructional Science, 33(4), 311-339.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wyner, Y., & Blatt, E. (2019). Connecting ecology to daily life: how students and teachers relate food webs to the food they eat. Journal of Biological Education, 53(2), 128-149.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Christiana Glettler, Gregor Torkar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright © Authors
