The Potential of Action Research for Improving Science Teaching – An Experience from Georgia
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Faculty of Business, Technology and Education, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia, Georgia
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Marika Kapanadze   

Faculty of Business, Technology and Education, Ilia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia, 3/5 Cholokashvili Av., 0162, Tbilisi, Georgia
Publish date: 2019-11-18
 
ARiSE 2019;2(2):1–2
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Action Research is an intense strategy of connecting practice and research. New teaching approaches and materials in Physics were developed during a master course at Ilia State University in Georgia. Pre-service teachers conducted Action Research using observations, interviews, and questionnaires to test and evaluate these innovative approaches in the classroom. The current paper describes how Georgian pre-service teachers have been working to improve physics teaching in the 7th grade. After implementing the inquiry-oriented lessons modules, the pre-service teachers noted a positive tendency in terms of students’ involvement and motivation toward physics.
 
REFERENCES (6)
1.
Gilbert, J.K. and Newberry, M. (2004). The Cams Hill Science Consortium: an inter-institutional collaborative action research project in science education. In: Ralle, B. and Eilks, I. (eds.) Quality in practice-oriented research in science education (pp. 53-62). Aachen: Shaker, Aachen.
 
2.
Kapanadze, M., & Eilks, I. (2014). Supporting reform in science education in central and eastern Europe-Reflections and perspectives from the project TEMPUS-SALiS. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(1), 47-58.
 
3.
Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2012). Action research to promote chemistry teachers’ professional development–Cases and experiences from Israel and Germany. International Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 10(3), 581-610.
 
4.
Towns, M. H., Kreke, K., & Fields, A. (2000). An action research project: Student perspectives on small-group learning in chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(1), 111.
 
5.
Panasan, M., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2010). Learning outcomes of project-based and inquiry-based learning activities. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 252-255.
 
6.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33.