"Who wants to retain excellence needs continuous transformation": The journey of a Science Education Centre in Austria
| 1 | Management, NaturErlebnisPark Science Education Center, Austria |
| 2 | Institut für Unterrichts- und Schulentwicklung, Alpen Adria Universität Klagenfurt, Austria |
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Franz Rauch
Institut für Unterrichts- und Schulentwicklung, Alpen Adria Universität Klagenfurt, Sterneckstraße 15, 9010, Klagenfurt, Austria
Institut für Unterrichts- und Schulentwicklung, Alpen Adria Universität Klagenfurt, Sterneckstraße 15, 9010, Klagenfurt, Austria
Publish date: 2019-07-24
ARiSE 2019;2(1):23–25
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Educational Action Research is not only an effective instrument for the development of teaching and the acquisition of educational knowledge, but also serves as a guiding philosophy for educational institutions in their continuous process of identity development and self-reflection. The example of an Austrian Science Education Centre shows in which dimensions this can be effective and gives an impression of how the idea of a continuous iterative development process can be shaped in practice.
REFERENCES (10)
1.
Bullock, M. & Ziegler, A. (1999). Scientific reasoning: Developmental and individual differences. In F. E. Weinert & W. Schneider (Eds.), Individual development from 3 to 12. Findings from the Munich Longitudinal Study. Cambridge: University Press.
2.
Dede, Ch. (2009). Comparing frameworks for “21st century skills”. Cambridge: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
3.
Feldmann, A., Altrichter, H., Posch, P. & Somekh, B. (2018). Teachers investigate their work (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
4.
Frantz-Pittner, A., Grabner, S., Bachmann, G. & Reicher-Pirchegger, E.; (2013). Exploring science with Fridolin – puppet- and toy-supported evaluation process for preschool and primary school children. In C. Wilby (Ed.), CARN Bulletin 2012. Manchester. The Collaborative Action Research Network.
5.
Frantz-Pittner, A. (2014). Problemorientiertes Lernen von Grundschulkindern an außerschulischen Lernorten unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Förderung von Teilkompetenzen der „Scientific Literacy“. Dissertation. Salzburg: Paris-Lodron-Universität.
6.
Grabner, S. (2014). Interessensentwicklung bei Grundschüler/innen durch forschendes Lernen im formalen und non-formalen Kontext. Dissertation. Salzburg: Paris-Lodron-Universität.
7.
Ollerenshaw, C., Ritchie, R. & Rieder, K. (2000). Kinder forschen. Naturwissenschaften im modernen Sachunterricht. Wien: öbv&hpt.
8.
Owen, R., Macnaghten, P. M., & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: from science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39, 751-760.
9.
Siebert, H. (1999). Pädagogischer Konstruktivismus. Neuwied: Luchterhand.
10.
United Nations (2015). Transforming our world. The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. United Nations.
Related articles
